← All research

Bivalirudin Versus Heparin and Protamine in Adult Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Annals of cardiac anaesthesia · 2026-10-01

Matthew Cadd, Samira Green, Daniel Puntis et al.

This systematic review pooled three randomized trials involving 407 adults undergoing cardiac surgery, comparing bivalirudin with unfractionated heparin for anticoagulation. Reexploration for hemorrhage, the primary outcome, did not differ significantly between groups (risk ratio 1.38, 95% confidence interval 0.42–4.48). No observable differences were reported in thromboembolic events, mortality, or postoperative transfusion requirements. All included trials had some concern for risk of bias, although interstudy heterogeneity was low across comparisons. The review also identified variability in bivalirudin dosing and therapeutic monitoring as limitations.

Clinical bottom line

The pooled trials did not establish a difference in major postoperative outcomes. The wide confidence interval for reexploration leaves substantial uncertainty and does not establish equivalence or safety.

Study limitation: Only 407 patients were pooled, with risk-of-bias concerns and variable bivalirudin dosing and monitoring.

Read the original on PubMed

AI-generated from the published abstract with automated source checks. For research discovery; consult the original paper before applying findings.